Home     Mosaic     CLIP     Octave     R Project     Processing     Contact  
Search
<http://cnfolio.com/M528CW20090405>
Electronics Manufacturing – M528

M528 coursework assignment

Academic year 2008/9



Coursework Title:  Supply chain and product manufacturing analysis
Coursework Due Date:  April 5, May 3 and May 22, 2009
Lecturer:  C Nguyen



COURSEWORK DESCRIPTION

The objective this coursework is to develop your ability to conduct self-directed research, analysis and reflection about supply chain and product manufacturing concepts. Studying real examples of organizations and products that use these principles will make it easier for you to apply the same concepts to your own future work experiences.

There are 3 articles required for this coursework, each with its own submission date and mark. The coursework mark is the average of all marks with the highest mark counted twice. This coursework contributes 50% to the M528 unit mark.

Each article must be approximately 650 words in length (excluding reference citations). Articles should inform the reader in a way that is easy to understand and reflects your own personal style. You may use supporting images, charts, diagrams and other visual elements from outside sources as long as each source is properly cited within your report using the Harvard APA referencing and citation format.

Article 1 was due April 5, 2009
Select a specific business in the electronics manufacturing industry. Write an article that compares and analyzes:

Article 2 was due May 3, 2009
Select a specific electronic product. Write an article that compares and analyzes:

Article 3 was due May 22, 2009
Select a specific electronic product. Write an article that compares and analyzes:



COURSEWORK SUBMISSION

Students are required to submit their coursework online using the Mosaic website.



ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

Each coursework article will be marked according to the following criteria:

(1) Analysis and reflection (50 marks)
MarksCriteria
40–50Article indicates an understanding of the relevant principles which is supported by thoughtful personal reflection and considerations of technical, financial or environmental issues.
35–39Article contains effective analysis of the relevant principles which is supported by thoughtful personal reflection and considerations of technical, financial or environmental issues.
30–34Article contains analysis of the relevant principles with some personal reflection and considerations of technical, financial or environmental issues.
25–29Article addresses the relevant principles with some considerations of technical, financial or environmental issues.
20–24Article has some considerations of technical, financial or environmental issues and the relevant principles.
0–19There is insufficient consideration of the relevant principles.


(2) Evidence of research (30 marks)
MarksCriteria
22–30Article contains supporting evidence that is creatively applied, highly relevant and well organized.
21Article contains supporting evidence that is highly relevant and well organized.
18–20Article contains supporting evidence that is relevant and organized.
15–17Article contains relevant supporting evidence.
12–14Article contains minimal supporting evidence.
0–11There is insufficient supporting evidence.


(3) Writing mechanics (20 marks)
MarksCriteria
16–20Article effectively uses a personal style that has a purposeful and easy to follow structure with very few grammar, punctuation or spelling errors.
14–15Article has a purposeful and easy to follow structure with very few grammar, punctuation or spelling errors.
12–13Article has a clear structure and few grammar, punctuation or spelling errors.
10–11Article has some structure and some grammar, punctuation or spelling errors.
8–9Article has minimal structure and some grammar, punctuation or spelling errors.
0–7Article has an ineffective structure and contains many grammar, punctuation or spelling errors.